I feel this review is written by someone who is pretty new to the series and isn't quite familiar with how RGG operates yet.
First, every long time fan since the first Kiwami has been saying the Kiwami series are bad remakes, 3 is about on par with what 1 and 2 did (2 is slightly higher with the cool ability to charge both square and triangle inputs while still being able to input other buttons), only difference is it's easier to play the original of 3 to compare. Kiwamis are bad and are not made with anywhere near as much attention as the regular entries. To see K3 as a sign of potential problems at RGG is to ignore what longer fans have been saying all along.
Second, there has been no "Apparent push to make the games yearly", if you look up RGG's releases you'll see that for as long as they've existed there has only ever been two years where they didn't release something, yearly is just what RGG does, and sometimes that release window is filled with a lower effort Kiwami while they work on something much bigger, just like now. There is no "Strain" on display here, they just didn't bother as much in the first place. Now, if their bigger projects coming up show the same signs then there's an issue, but K3 is just par for the course.
K3 isn't great, that's true, but it sure as hell ain't a 2/10, unless you'd put K1 and K2 at like 3/10 or something as they're just as guilty of the same stuff. If people just listened to the older fans K3 might not have come as much of a shock as it apparently has to people.
How did this expletive deleted get a review code? They definitely won't get one next time. 20/100 is just so disingenuous. Admitting she never liked Yakuza 3 in the first place, whines about something EXTRA being short. Whines about Mine defending Kanda like Mine is supposed to be a good guy. What is with people who get made that characters in the Yakuza games are doing what they should be doing? You're not supposed to think these are good people bozo. These games are not for YOU. And of course the eLaPhAnT iN tHe RoOm. That's the real reason this game and this series is being dragged through the mud. Without the Kagawa casting this game would be universally praised and have at least an 8 out of 10 most reviews. Zero journalistic integrity or credibility.
Thanks for the review! It's a real shame to hear about all these issues, I'm so disappointed in RGGS. I guess I can save my money and skip this one entirely.
Thanks for the review! It's a real shame to hear about all these issues, I'm so disappointed in RGGS. I guess I can save my money and skip this one entirely.
I feel this review is written by someone who is pretty new to the series and isn't quite familiar with how RGG operates yet.
First, every long time fan since the first Kiwami has been saying the Kiwami series are bad remakes, 3 is about on par with what 1 and 2 did (2 is slightly higher with the cool ability to charge both square and triangle inputs while still being able to input other buttons), only difference is it's easier to play the original of 3 to compare. Kiwamis are bad and are not made with anywhere near as much attention as the regular entries. To see K3 as a sign of potential problems at RGG is to ignore what longer fans have been saying all along.
Second, there has been no "Apparent push to make the games yearly", if you look up RGG's releases you'll see that for as long as they've existed there has only ever been two years where they didn't release something, yearly is just what RGG does, and sometimes that release window is filled with a lower effort Kiwami while they work on something much bigger, just like now. There is no "Strain" on display here, they just didn't bother as much in the first place. Now, if their bigger projects coming up show the same signs then there's an issue, but K3 is just par for the course.
K3 isn't great, that's true, but it sure as hell ain't a 2/10, unless you'd put K1 and K2 at like 3/10 or something as they're just as guilty of the same stuff. If people just listened to the older fans K3 might not have come as much of a shock as it apparently has to people.
How did this expletive deleted get a review code? They definitely won't get one next time. 20/100 is just so disingenuous. Admitting she never liked Yakuza 3 in the first place, whines about something EXTRA being short. Whines about Mine defending Kanda like Mine is supposed to be a good guy. What is with people who get made that characters in the Yakuza games are doing what they should be doing? You're not supposed to think these are good people bozo. These games are not for YOU. And of course the eLaPhAnT iN tHe RoOm. That's the real reason this game and this series is being dragged through the mud. Without the Kagawa casting this game would be universally praised and have at least an 8 out of 10 most reviews. Zero journalistic integrity or credibility.
I feel this review is written by someone who is pretty new to the series and isn't quite familiar with how RGG operates yet.
First, every long time fan since the first Kiwami has been saying the Kiwami series are bad remakes, 3 is about on par with what 1 and 2 did (2 is slightly higher with the cool ability to charge both square and triangle inputs while still being able to input other buttons), only difference is it's easier to play the original of 3 to compare. Kiwamis are bad and are not made with anywhere near as much attention as the regular entries. To see K3 as a sign of potential problems at RGG is to ignore what longer fans have been saying all along.
Second, there has been no "Apparent push to make the games yearly", if you look up RGG's releases you'll see that for as long as they've existed there has only ever been two years where they didn't release something, yearly is just what RGG does, and sometimes that release window is filled with a lower effort Kiwami while they work on something much bigger, just like now. There is no "Strain" on display here, they just didn't bother as much in the first place. Now, if their bigger projects coming up show the same signs then there's an issue, but K3 is just par for the course.
K3 isn't great, that's true, but it sure as hell ain't a 2/10, unless you'd put K1 and K2 at like 3/10 or something as they're just as guilty of the same stuff. If people just listened to the older fans K3 might not have come as much of a shock as it apparently has to people.
How did this expletive deleted get a review code? They definitely won't get one next time. 20/100 is just so disingenuous. Admitting she never liked Yakuza 3 in the first place, whines about something EXTRA being short. Whines about Mine defending Kanda like Mine is supposed to be a good guy. What is with people who get made that characters in the Yakuza games are doing what they should be doing? You're not supposed to think these are good people bozo. These games are not for YOU. And of course the eLaPhAnT iN tHe RoOm. That's the real reason this game and this series is being dragged through the mud. Without the Kagawa casting this game would be universally praised and have at least an 8 out of 10 most reviews. Zero journalistic integrity or credibility.
Its a shame MC and OC take in account this clown review
Thanks for the review! It's a real shame to hear about all these issues, I'm so disappointed in RGGS. I guess I can save my money and skip this one entirely.
This is an important review with great meritorical value. :)
Excellent work as always, Lexi!
This is an outrage review with little to no meritorical value.
You know someone has no journalistic integrity when the lowest review scores are 6 and you decide to give it a 2 because you're mad about an actor.
This is an important review with great meritorical value. :)
Excellent work as always, Lexi!
Thanks for the review! It's a real shame to hear about all these issues, I'm so disappointed in RGGS. I guess I can save my money and skip this one entirely.
I feel this review is written by someone who is pretty new to the series and isn't quite familiar with how RGG operates yet.
First, every long time fan since the first Kiwami has been saying the Kiwami series are bad remakes, 3 is about on par with what 1 and 2 did (2 is slightly higher with the cool ability to charge both square and triangle inputs while still being able to input other buttons), only difference is it's easier to play the original of 3 to compare. Kiwamis are bad and are not made with anywhere near as much attention as the regular entries. To see K3 as a sign of potential problems at RGG is to ignore what longer fans have been saying all along.
Second, there has been no "Apparent push to make the games yearly", if you look up RGG's releases you'll see that for as long as they've existed there has only ever been two years where they didn't release something, yearly is just what RGG does, and sometimes that release window is filled with a lower effort Kiwami while they work on something much bigger, just like now. There is no "Strain" on display here, they just didn't bother as much in the first place. Now, if their bigger projects coming up show the same signs then there's an issue, but K3 is just par for the course.
K3 isn't great, that's true, but it sure as hell ain't a 2/10, unless you'd put K1 and K2 at like 3/10 or something as they're just as guilty of the same stuff. If people just listened to the older fans K3 might not have come as much of a shock as it apparently has to people.
How did this expletive deleted get a review code? They definitely won't get one next time. 20/100 is just so disingenuous. Admitting she never liked Yakuza 3 in the first place, whines about something EXTRA being short. Whines about Mine defending Kanda like Mine is supposed to be a good guy. What is with people who get made that characters in the Yakuza games are doing what they should be doing? You're not supposed to think these are good people bozo. These games are not for YOU. And of course the eLaPhAnT iN tHe RoOm. That's the real reason this game and this series is being dragged through the mud. Without the Kagawa casting this game would be universally praised and have at least an 8 out of 10 most reviews. Zero journalistic integrity or credibility.
Its a shame MC and OC take in account this clown review
This is an outrage review with little to no meritorical value.
You know someone has no journalistic integrity when the lowest review scores are 6 and you decide to give it a 2 because you're mad about an actor.